Clean Claim Rate / Bad Debt Write-Offs | | | A “clean claim” may still require manual work to get paid. A “zero-touch” claim sails through adjudication with zero human intervention — no follow-ups, no wasted time. Accurate financial clearance upstream eliminates rework and manual back-office processing which naturally reduces denials and bad debt downstream. |
Cost to Collect / Labor Efficiency | Avoidable Touches (Waste) | | Avoidable touches capture redundant or premature follow-ups and task assignments that add no value. Configuring worklists by payer response timelines and providing additional training where necessary prevents wasted effort, improves labor efficiency and lowers overall cost to collect. |
Denial Rate / Denials as % of Revenue | Avoidable Touches (Denials) | | Avoidable Touches Related to Denials reflects how efficiently staff handle preventable denials. When representatives lack the expertise or authority to resolve issues independently, they create additional tasks for others — multiplying work and delaying resolution. Tracking and reducing these touches builds expertise, speeds recovery, and lowers overall denial rates. |
| | | When intervention is required, one touch should be enough. Tracking first-touch payments gives real-time visibility into where claims stall, whether it’s a representative, payer, or process breakdown and helps reduce aging. |
Staff Productivity (Claims per FTE) | Average Touches to Claim Resolution | | Traditional productivity metrics only show that a claim was paid, not how much effort it took to get there. Measuring touches per claim exposes the hidden labor cost behind collections. Reducing those touches increases throughput, efficiency, and true staff productivity. |